top of page

5 Ways Capitalism Fuels Corporatism and Glorifies the Minority Rich

Why there is poverty and why do we accept it? Was it in our nature to have a minority rich and a majority poor or is it what has been educated and spoon fed to us since our birth? In today's world, capitalism is often hailed as the epitome of economic prosperity, innovation and progress. However, upon closer examination, a troubling truth emerges. This blog post delves into the dark side of capitalism, exposing 5 ways it nurtures corporatism, glorifies the wealthy minority, and perpetuates the dangerous notion that poverty is a necessary sacrifice for societal and economic advancement.


Image source: Welcome to Capitalism


1. Capitalism and Corporatism

Capitalism and corporatism are two interconnected concepts that often go hand in hand. While capitalism refers to an economic system based on private ownership and the pursuit of profit, corporatism refers to a system where economic and political power is concentrated in the hands of large corporations and their associated interest groups. Think about the country you're living. Think about the amount of tax you're paying. Think about the big corporations that are running your country without paying a penny. That's what I'm saying!


What is corporatism and its connection to capitalism?

Corporatism can be understood as a system where societal and economic interests are organized and represented by corporate entities, often at the expense of individual citizens and smaller businesses. It involves close collaboration between the government, powerful corporations, and organized interest groups to shape economic and political policies. In this system, corporations exert significant influence over decision-making processes, contributing to the consolidation of power and wealth.


Is corporate power and influence in capitalist societies is real?

As capitalism has evolved, there has been a notable rise in the power and influence of large corporations. Through mergers, acquisitions, and the accumulation of wealth, corporations have expanded their market dominance, often resulting in limited competition and reduced consumer choice. This concentration of power enables corporations to influence market dynamics, shape industry regulations, and exert considerable control over resources and labor.


What is the impact of corporate lobbying on public policy and legislation?

Corporate lobbying plays a crucial role in shaping public policy and legislation in capitalist societies. Powerful corporations employ lobbyists to influence government decisions in their favor. This influence can manifest in various ways, such as shaping tax policies, securing subsidies and favorable regulations, and influencing trade agreements. As a result, corporate interests often take precedence over the needs and well-being of ordinary citizens, potentially distorting democratic processes. Corporate lobbying can also lead to regulatory capture, where regulatory bodies intended to protect the public interest become influenced or controlled by the very industries they are meant to regulate. This phenomenon further reinforces the dominance of corporations and hampers efforts to address social and environmental concerns.


To address these issues, some argue for greater transparency in lobbying activities, stricter regulations on campaign financing, and the promotion of policies that prioritize the welfare of the broader population over the interests of powerful corporations. This requires a careful balance between supporting entrepreneurship and innovation while curbing the excessive influence of corporations on public policy.


2. The Glorification of the Wealthy

Society's fascination with the ultra-rich has given rise to a "billionaire cult," where individuals are idolized for their extreme wealth. The media often portrays opulence and excess as aspirational goals, creating a culture that glorifies material wealth. However, this obsession with the wealthy has detrimental effects on society. Wealth inequality hinders social mobility and limits opportunities for those from disadvantaged backgrounds. Instead of promoting a fair and inclusive society, the glorification of the wealthy perpetuates the notion that extreme wealth is the ultimate measure of success. It is important to question these narratives and work towards a more equitable society that values social progress and shared prosperity over the glorification of a select few.


What is the billionaire cult?

The billionaire cult refers to society's fascination and obsession with the ultra-rich. It is a phenomenon where individuals who possess immense wealth and financial power are idolized and revered. People are often captivated by their luxurious lifestyles, extravagant possessions, and influence over global affairs. This fascination is perpetuated by media coverage that highlights their opulence and success, portraying them as aspirational figures to emulate. The billionaire cult raises important questions about societal values and priorities. It reflects a broader cultural shift where wealth and material possessions have become the markers of success and status. The ultra-rich are often seen as role models, and their achievements are celebrated as the epitome of the "American Dream" or entrepreneurial success.


However, this fascination with the ultra-rich has its downsides. It can lead to the glorification of excessive wealth and create an unrealistic perception of success. The focus on billionaires can overshadow the contributions and struggles of the middle class and working class, reinforcing social hierarchies and income inequality. It also diverts attention from systemic issues and structural inequalities that perpetuate poverty and hinder social progress. Critics argue that the billionaire cult promotes a culture of greed, materialism, and individualism, undermining the values of empathy, community, and equality. They argue that society should prioritize the well-being of all its members, rather than idolizing and glorifying a select few. By shifting the focus from extreme wealth to collective progress and social justice, we can work towards a more inclusive and equitable society.


Media portrayals of rich and excess as aspirational goals

Media portrayals of the rich and excess as aspirational goals have become increasingly prevalent in our society. From reality TV shows showcasing the lives of the super-rich to glamorous advertisements promoting luxury lifestyles, the media often presents a distorted view of success and happiness. These portrayals create a narrative where material wealth is equated with personal fulfillment and achievement. The constant exposure to images of lavish mansions, expensive cars, and extravagant vacations can create a desire for a similar lifestyle, leading individuals to strive for wealth as a means to attain happiness and social status.


However, this portrayal of opulence as an ideal can have negative consequences. It reinforces the notion that happiness and fulfillment are directly linked to material possessions, leading to a perpetual cycle of consumerism and the pursuit of wealth. It can also breed feelings of inadequacy and discontent among those who are unable to attain such levels of affluence, contributing to a culture of comparison and dissatisfaction. Moreover, the media's focus on the wealthy elite often ignores the underlying inequalities and systemic barriers that contribute to wealth accumulation. It fails to acknowledge the privileges and advantages that enable some individuals to amass extreme wealth while others struggle to meet their basic needs. This portrayal perpetuates the notion that financial success is solely based on personal effort and disregards the importance of factors like social capital, inheritance, and systemic advantages.


Critics argue that media should promote more diverse and realistic representations of success, highlighting achievements that go beyond material wealth. By showcasing stories of individuals making a positive impact on their communities, pursuing meaningful careers, and prioritizing personal growth and well-being, the media can help redefine what it means to be successful and inspire a broader range of aspirations.


What are the effects of wealth inequality on social mobility and opportunity?

Wealth inequality has profound effects on social mobility and opportunity within a society. When a significant wealth gap exists, it can create barriers and limitations that hinder individuals from accessing upward mobility and achieving their full potential.

  1. Limited Access to Education: Wealthier individuals have greater resources to invest in quality education, including private schools, tutors, and enrichment programs. This advantage can result in better academic outcomes and opportunities for higher education, while those from lower-income backgrounds may face limited access to quality educational resources. Unequal access to education perpetuates the cycle of inequality, making it harder for individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds to compete on an equal footing.

  2. Unequal Job Opportunities: Wealth inequality can lead to unequal job opportunities, as individuals from privileged backgrounds often have better networks and connections. They may have access to prestigious internships, mentorship programs, and job placements through family or social connections. This can result in a lack of equal opportunities for individuals from lower-income backgrounds, hindering their ability to secure well-paying jobs and advance in their careers.

  3. Limited Entrepreneurial Opportunities: Wealth inequality can create barriers for aspiring entrepreneurs. Access to startup capital, business networks, and financial resources is crucial for launching and growing a successful business. However, individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds often lack the necessary financial backing and social capital to start their ventures, limiting their entrepreneurial opportunities.

  4. Health Disparities: Wealth inequality is closely linked to health disparities. Affluent individuals have better access to healthcare, including preventive services, quality medical facilities, and specialized treatments. In contrast, those with limited financial resources may face challenges in accessing essential healthcare services, leading to poorer health outcomes and reduced opportunities for overall well-being.

  5. Political Influence: Wealthy individuals and corporations often have significant influence on political decision-making through lobbying and campaign contributions. This influence can lead to policies that favor the interests of the wealthy while neglecting the needs of the broader population. As a result, wealth inequality can perpetuate a system where the rich have more influence over public policy, further entrenching the disparities in opportunities and resources.

You can't deny that these effects of wealth inequality create a vicious cycle, as limited social mobility and unequal opportunities reinforce and perpetuate existing economic disparities. Addressing wealth inequality requires policies and initiatives that promote equal access to education, job opportunities, healthcare, and a fairer distribution of wealth and resources. By creating a more equitable society, we can foster social mobility and provide individuals with greater opportunities to improve their lives and contribute to the overall progress of society. The absurdity of it all is that when the poor say "if it wasn't for the rich, we didn't have all these innovations and choices." They refer to increasing number of movies and options in purchasing indicating that. My question is, who are these two factors benefiting?


3. The Myth: Is Poverty a Necessity for Economic and Social Improvement?

This is a myth has been taught to us in school, by our parent, visa various forms of media and social media. The myth of poverty as a necessity refers to the idea that poverty is often portrayed as a necessary condition for societal and economic progress. This belief is perpetuated through various means, including the rhetoric of "economic striving" and the glorification of the "self-made" success story. However, the consequences of this myth are significant, both on an individual and societal level.

  1. Rhetoric of "Economic Striving": The rhetoric of "economic striving" suggests that individuals must endure poverty and hardship in order to achieve success. This narrative promotes the idea that poverty is a necessary stepping stone towards prosperity, creating a mindset that justifies the existence of poverty as an unavoidable part of the path to success. Such rhetoric can discourage efforts to address poverty and inequality, as it implies that those who are impoverished simply need to work harder, rather than recognizing systemic barriers and structural inequalities.

  2. Glorification of the "Self-Made" Success Story: Society often glorifies the stories of individuals who have risen from poverty to wealth, portraying them as self-made successes. While these stories can be inspirational, they can also reinforce the notion that poverty is a necessary part of the journey to success. This glorification can overshadow the systemic factors that contribute to poverty, such as limited access to resources, education, and opportunities. It can also create a false belief that anyone can escape poverty through sheer determination, ignoring the structural disadvantages faced by marginalized communities.

  3. Psychological Impact of Poverty: Poverty takes a toll not only on individuals' material well-being but also on their psychological and emotional well-being. The experience of poverty often leads to stress, anxiety, and a constant struggle to meet basic needs. The myth of poverty as a necessity adds an additional psychological burden by suggesting that poverty is an inherent and unavoidable aspect of life. This can perpetuate a cycle of hopelessness and despair, making it harder for individuals to break free from poverty and improve their circumstances.

  4. Perpetuation of Poverty: The belief that poverty is a necessity can lead to a lack of investment in poverty alleviation measures and social safety nets. It can shape public policies that prioritize economic growth without addressing income inequality and systemic barriers. By perpetuating the myth, society risks accepting poverty as an inevitable part of the social and economic fabric, rather than actively working towards its eradication.

Now, in my idea, challenging the myth of poverty as a necessity requires a shift in societal mindset and a comprehensive approach to poverty alleviation. It involves recognizing that poverty is not a necessary condition for progress and acknowledging the structural factors that contribute to its persistence. Efforts should be directed towards creating equitable opportunities, providing social support systems, and addressing systemic inequalities to break the cycle of poverty and create a more just and inclusive society. What's the solution you may ask? I will answer that in the last section.


4. Brainwashing the Masses

In modern capitalist societies, the masses are often subjected to various forms of brainwashing that perpetuate certain ideologies and reinforce the status quo. Here are the key aspects to consider:

  1. The Power of Advertising: Advertising plays a significant role in shaping public perception and consumer behavior. Through clever marketing techniques, advertisers create desires and manipulate individuals into believing that their happiness and fulfillment lie in material possessions. This constant bombardment of consumerist messages influences people's values, aspirations, and purchasing habits, fostering a culture of excessive consumption.

  2. Media Manipulation: Mass media plays a crucial role in disseminating information and shaping public opinion. However, media outlets can be influenced by corporate interests and wealthier individuals who control the narrative. This can result in the portrayal of poverty as a personal failure rather than a systemic issue. By focusing on individual stories of success or highlighting extreme cases of poverty, the media can reinforce the notion that poverty is solely the result of personal choices or shortcomings, thereby shifting blame away from broader social and economic factors.

  3. Normalization of Income Disparity: In capitalist societies, income inequality has become increasingly normalized and accepted by the masses. This normalization is fueled by a variety of factors, including the glorification of wealth and the perception that success is attainable for anyone willing to work hard enough. The influence of the wealthy elite extends to shaping public discourse, policies, and legislation, often favoring their interests and perpetuating income disparity.

Solving these issues, in my perspective, requires a critical understanding and active resistance against the mechanisms of manipulation and brainwashing.


5. Alternatives and Solutions

In order to challenge the existing system that perpetuates wealth inequality and brainwashing, it is crucial to explore alternative economic models that prioritize equality and well-being. Anarcho-communism, for instance, advocates for a society without hierarchical structures where resources are shared collectively, ensuring that everyone's needs are met. Embracing such alternative models requires grassroots movements and political engagement. By organizing and mobilizing communities, individuals can collectively advocate for systemic changes, such as wealth redistribution, campaign finance reform, and the regulation of media and advertising. Therefore, simply put we need a Utopia! But why they tell you it will never work? Why they tell you human by nature can't tolerate living in a utopian society in which they can be and do whatever they want without harming themselves, others living beings and the environment? Well, there's an answer to this.


Why they tell you Utopia doesn't exist?

Here's my answer. The notion that utopia doesn't exist is often propagated by those who benefit from maintaining the status quo and preserving existing power structures. Capitalist societies, for example, tend to emphasize the idea that striving for personal success and accumulating wealth is the key to happiness and fulfillment. By dismissing utopia as unattainable, they discourage people from questioning the inherent flaws and injustices within the current system. Furthermore, the argument that utopia doesn't exist can be used as a tool to suppress dissent and maintain control over the masses. It discourages individuals from imagining alternative possibilities and accepting the limitations of the existing social and economic order. This narrative is often reinforced through media, education systems, and cultural norms that emphasize the need to accept the current reality as the only feasible option.



However, it is important to recognize that the concept of utopia is not meant to represent a flawless or perfect society. Instead, it serves as an aspiration for a better, more just, and equitable world. By dismissing utopia, we risk perpetuating the status quo and inhibiting the progress necessary to address pressing social and economic issues. It is through questioning, envisioning alternatives, and striving for positive change that societies can move closer to achieving a more utopian-like state, even if it may never be fully realized.


The Utopia We Need

From an anarcho-communist perspective, challenging the myth of poverty as a necessity involves advocating for a radical transformation of society and the dismantling of capitalist structures that perpetuate inequality. Here's a solution that aligns with an anarcho-communist ideology:

1. Abolishing Private Ownership: No! It doesn't mean that you have to give up your house, your wife and children to anybody. That's what they told you to manipulate you again! The Anarcho-communism calls for the abolition of private ownership of the means of production. This means that resources and industries would be collectively owned and managed by the community as a whole, ensuring equitable distribution and access to wealth and resources. You see! This is what big corporation and minority of rich in control won't benefit from so they manipulate the whole concept and twist the truth the way to control you: The Mass!


2. Economic Equality: Capitalism, as an economic system, is primarily driven by the pursuit of profit and individual self-interest. It operates based on the principles of private ownership, free markets, and competition. It's all about Wealth accumulation, Competition and meritocracy, Profit-driven motive and Power imbalances. Does it concern you as the majority poor? Nope! Anarcho-communism seeks to eliminate this wealth disparities by prioritizing economic equality. This can be achieved by implementing systems such as communal ownership, where resources and goods are shared based on need, rather than through market mechanisms that perpetuate wealth accumulation and income inequality.



3. Emphasizing Cooperation: Capitalism is often resistant to certain forms of cooperation due to its focus on competition and individual profit maximization. Excessive cooperation among competitors can be seen as undermining the competitive nature of the system. Additionally, cooperation that addresses economic inequality or challenges existing power structures may be viewed as a threat to the principles and interests of capitalism. Anarcho-communism places a strong emphasis on cooperation and mutual aid. Communities would work together to meet the needs of all individuals, ensuring that no one is left behind. This includes establishing communal support systems that provide for healthcare, education, housing, and other essential needs as basic rights.


4. Direct Democracy: Capitalism may be resistant to direct democracy due to several reasons. Firstly, direct democracy involves collective decision-making and equal participation of all individuals in the decision-making process. This can potentially challenge the hierarchical power structures and concentrated wealth that are prevalent in capitalist systems. Capitalism often prioritizes profit-driven decision-making by a select few, such as business owners and investors, rather than a broader democratic process.


Secondly, direct democracy can introduce more regulations and oversight, which can be seen as burdensome and restrictive to businesses operating in a capitalist economy. It may limit the freedom of businesses to operate without extensive interference from collective decision-making bodies. Furthermore, capitalism relies on the market mechanism, where supply and demand determine resource allocation and economic decisions. Direct democracy can introduce a more collective decision-making process that may not align with the efficiency and speed of market-based decision-making. In this regard Anarcho-communism advocates for direct democracy, where decisions are made collectively through voluntary associations and assemblies. This ensures that power is decentralized and that everyone has a say in shaping the policies and practices that affect their lives.


5. Non-hierarchical Organizing: Capitalism is often resistant to non-hierarchical organizing because it relies on hierarchical structures and individual ownership. Non-hierarchical organizing promotes shared decision-making, egalitarianism, and collective ownership, which challenges capitalist power dynamics and concentration of wealth. Capitalism thrives on hierarchical authority and profit maximization, while non-hierarchical organizing prioritizes egalitarianism and social/environmental considerations. Although there are variations within capitalism that incorporate cooperative elements, the core principles of capitalism can create barriers to non-hierarchical organizing. Anarcho-communism rejects hierarchical structures and promotes non-hierarchical organizing. This includes encouraging decentralized decision-making, voluntary associations, and horizontal relationships where power is shared equally among individuals.


6. Education and Consciousness: Anarcho-communism recognizes the importance of education and consciousness-raising to challenge the prevailing capitalist ideology. By promoting critical thinking and awareness of systemic inequalities, individuals can actively engage in dismantling oppressive structures and working towards a more egalitarian society. Well, you may ask how it can be different from what Capitalism is doing using education in any form to brainwash and manipulate. That's a good question because no system is perfect. In my opinion, to prevent anarcho-communism education from becoming a tool for brainwashing, it is essential to uphold principles of autonomy, critical thinking, and collective decision-making.


Anarcho-communism advocates for a society where power is decentralized and decisions are made collectively through direct democracy. This ensures that no single group or individual can manipulate or control the narrative. Additionally, anarcho-communism promotes education that encourages critical thinking, open dialogue, and the exploration of diverse perspectives. By fostering an environment of intellectual freedom and encouraging individuals to question and challenge authority, anarcho-communism aims to prevent the reproduction of oppressive ideologies. The emphasis on individual autonomy and collective decision-making, coupled with a commitment to ongoing education and consciousness-raising, serves as a safeguard against the pitfalls of brainwashing and promotes a society that values freedom, equality, and genuine participation.


7. Solidarity and Community Building: Capitalism, by its nature as we discussed earlier, is driven by individualistic and competitive interests rather than collective solidarity and community building. In a capitalist system, the pursuit of profit and self-interest often takes precedence over the well-being of the community as a whole. This can lead to a disregard for social cohesion and a lack of emphasis on the needs and welfare of marginalized or vulnerable groups.


What is Solidarity and community building?

  1. Solidarity is the unity, support, and mutual aid among individuals or groups who share common goals, interests, or struggles. It involves standing together in times of need, advocating for collective rights, and working towards common objectives.

  2. Community building refers to the process of fostering connections, cooperation, and shared responsibility within a group or community. It involves promoting inclusivity, collaboration, and the development of social networks to create a sense of belonging and work towards collective well-being.

This promote cooperation, mutual support, and a sense of shared responsibility. These values can challenge the capitalist framework by prioritizing the common good over individual gain. By fostering a strong sense of community and promoting collective action, solidarity can empower marginalized groups and work towards a more equitable society. However, capitalism tends to undermine solidarity and community building by emphasizing individual success, wealth accumulation, and the pursuit of self-interest, which can hinder efforts to build cohesive and inclusive communities. Capitalism's focus on competition, profit maximization, and individualism can create divisions and reinforce inequalities within society. It often encourages a mindset that prioritizes personal gain at the expense of others, leading to a weakening of community bonds and social cohesion. Additionally, capitalism's reliance on market mechanisms and profit-driven decision-making can undermine collective efforts to address social issues and create sustainable, community-oriented solutions.


Anarcho-communism emphasizes the importance of solidarity and community building. By fostering strong social bonds and supporting marginalized groups, communities can collectively resist exploitation, challenge oppressive systems, and create spaces of inclusivity and support.


My Final Thoughts

Capitalism's stronghold on society is undeniably powerful, but it is essential to question its flaws and confront the system's role in perpetuating corporatism, glorifying the wealthy, and maintaining the illusion that poverty is a necessary sacrifice for societal advancement. In my idea, an anarcho-communism society is a solution to social and economic inequality under capitalism. This is because of its core principles and beliefs. It advocates for the abolition of both the state and private ownership of the means of production, aiming for a society based on common ownership and the absence of hierarchies.


In this regard, anarcho-communism seeks to address the root causes of inequality. It promotes the equitable distribution of resources, goods, and services, ensuring that everyone's needs are met. Without the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few, anarcho-communism strives for a society where social and economic disparities are minimized. The anarcho-communism emphasizes direct democracy, community cooperation, and voluntary association. It encourages active participation and decision-making at the local level, allowing individuals to have a direct say in shaping their own lives and communities. This focus on self-governance and shared responsibility aims to create a more egalitarian and inclusive society where people have equal opportunities and collective well-being is prioritized.


However, it's important to note that creating such society with a capitalist perspective of how a society functions and what are the needs of a society to survive, will result in yet another imbalance society, As Marx well said "History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce."


This shows that attempting to create a society without addressing the fundamental flaws of capitalism can lead to the replication of oppressive structures in a different form. Anarcho-communism seeks to address the root causes of inequality by challenging the capitalist framework altogether, rather than simply reforming it. So, anarcho-communist society would require a fundamental shift in societal values, norms, and consciousness. It would involve dismantling existing power structures and fostering a culture of cooperation, solidarity, and mutual aid. Additionally, addressing the potential pitfalls of authoritarianism, lack of productivity incentives, and decision-making processes would be essential to ensure that anarcho-communism does not replicate the flaws it seeks to overcome.



12 views1 comment
bottom of page